The following are required for the project paper: Title Page Executive Summary T

The following are required for the project paper:
Title Page
Executive Summary
Table of Contents
Description/Overview: Introduction
Literature Review
Brief description and overview:
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the positive and negative impacts that social media has had in relation to the Covid-19 response. One of the major purposes for examining the effects of social media on the Covid-19 response is to assist in crisis management. Some of the relevant issues that will be discussed in more detail are public awareness, fake news, knowledge sharing, anxiety, and mental health and wellbeing. In December 2021, the World Health Organization released a report alongside the University of Melbourne called “Social Media and Covid-19: Global Study of Digital Crisis Interaction Among Gen Z and Millenials” displaying the necessity to study how online platforms are impacting youth. However, the report does not speak on an older demographic that might find it more difficult to differentiate between real and fake content, leading to the spread of misinformation and mistrust of certain social media venues.
With that said, several social media platforms such as Twitter and Instagram have added warning signs on posts that were not verified or had misleading information in order to combat misinformation and communication. Instant messaging applications such as WhatsApp added a “forwarded too many times” that limited how much one could forward at a time and notified users of the quick spread of chain messages.
With the Covid-19 pandemic being one of the first prolonged major global events since the widespread use of social media, it has become a tool used by the emergency management community, shareholders, politicians, governments, and general populations for rapid information sharing. This is a trend that will continue as time progresses and will be a crucial component for managing emergencies and crises for the foreseeable future.
Social media usage has been shown to increase in situations of natural disasters and other crises. It is crucial for the scientific community to understand how social media works in order to enhance our capabilities and create a more resilient community. Through social media communication, the scientific community can collaborate around the globe in a faster way to find the most important findings of a disease with a decreased knowledge transition time to other healthcare providers (HCPs). This is very important to coordinate research and knowledge during a time of uncertainty and potentially fake news. During the 2020 global pandemic, social media has become an ally but also a potential threat. High volumes of information compressed into a short period can cause overwhelmed HCPs trying to discern fact from noise. A major limitation of social media currently is the ability to quickly disseminate false information, which can confuse and distract. Society relies on educated scientists and physicians to be leaders in delivering fact-based information to the public. For this reason, in times of crisis, it is important to be leaders in the conversation of social media to guide correct and helpful information and knowledge to the masses looking for answers.
COVID-19 has limited in-person social interactions, but people are connecting online more than ever. For example, social media engagement increased by 61 percent during the first wave of the Pandemic. For many, social media has become a lifeline to the outside world, especially as people look for ways to remain connected and entertained.
So, with social distancing measures in place across the globe, is Instagram really better than our current reality? Not exactly, according to mental health experts. While social media can play a critical role in keeping friends and family connected during times of forced separation, users should be aware of how longer periods of mindless scrolling can have a detrimental impact on their mental health.

Leave a Reply